A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The focus is around the intention to cause injury. This can be a major problem: an extremely minimal threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to really make it ideal towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified from the decision from the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are of your view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally seem, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're topic to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case of your petitioners for promotion could be regarded as, however, we've been obvious in our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, subject to availability of vacancy subject matter for the approval of your competent authority.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of this case with their capable assistance.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have get more info ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of your grid project and submitted that sufficient mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to get crafted.
Upholding Justice: The application with the legislation plus the subsequent punishment in the guilty party offer a perception of closure and justice to the victim’s family and loved ones.
Accessing free case regulation sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and any individual seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
Inside the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court may be the highest court from the United States. Reduce courts within the federal level involve the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related on the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every single state has its have judicial system that incorporates trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Just about every state is frequently referred to as being the “supreme” court, Even though there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the The big apple Court of Appeals or even the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, Whilst state courts may also generally hear cases involving federal laws.
Criminal cases During the common law tradition, courts decide the law applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil regulation systems, common law systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lessen courts should make decisions regular with the previous decisions of higher courts.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
It also addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and one hundred twenty from the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.